The recent Glenn Beck broadcast, which showed the similarities between the Roman symbol of fascism (a bundle of rods with an ax attached, symbolizing collectivism and power) and the design on the reverse of the Mercury Dime (introduced in 1916, with basically the same symbol described above), left many people wondering what the economic differences between the two ideologies really are.
Here’s a brief rundown:
Economic Control
Socialism - Seeks totalitarian control of the economy through direct state operation of production
Fascism - Seeks indirect control of the economy through domination of nominally private owners
Property
Socialism - Property is nationalized explicitly
Fascism - Property use required to be in the national interest
Free Markets
Socialism - Free markets are abolished
Fascism - Free market appears to remain in place, though the government completely controls that market
In summary, the basic economic differences between socialism and fascism are not the end result, but all in appearances. Both completely control the economy, property, and the markets, but socialism admits to doing so while fascism tries to convince us that capitalism is still at work, even though it is not.
The prominent symbol of fascism on the Mercury dime leaves some to conclude that the US government has been creeping ever closer to fascism since the days of Woodrow Wilson. Regardless of whether you believe that, it’s clear that the recent government involvement with AIG and GM certainly fall more into the realm of fascism than socialism, which is certainly cause for concern.
If you enjoyed this post, subscribe to my feed via RSS or email.
You can support Richer by the Day by visiting our advertisers and sponsors. A thumbs up from any StumbleUpon users would also be greatly appreciated.
Related Posts
2008 IRS Economic Stimulus Payment SchedulePhase Out Details for 2008 Economic Stimulus Plan
New 2008 Tax Credit - Recovery Rebate Credit
Cost Differences After Our Move
US Taxpayers Collectively Free From 2009 Taxes on April 13th








April 2nd, 2009 at 3:59 pm
A Lincoln pretty much sold out democracy to fascism during the civil war. It’s been fascism all the way, with our polictical representation gradaully becoming just the ceremonial PR front to amuse the masses, much as the the royals do in Briton.
Now the multinational corporations that run everyting, have gotton so greed, they pretty much have proceeded to loot the entire treasury, as they are too big to fail. All pretense at democracy will start to crumble as they continue to swallow every drop of public resources and force the end of any service to citizens. Why do you think they have contingency plans in place to handle mass unrest? What could possibly make people so unhappy they might resort to violence? Figure it out Einstiens.